The method of determining the cost for each production activity is called Activity-based costing (ABC). Computing overhead production costs is crucial for businesses to determine accurate product pricing. While companies focus more on optimising raw material and labour costs, overhead costs are often overlooked. However, optimising overhead costs can also result in overall cost reduction. It will help companies accurately determine product pricing.
This blog explores the meaning of activity-based costing (ABC) and highlights its importance.
An activity-based costing (ABC) system is useful for finding production costs. It provides granular details about overhead costs associated with each production-related activity. Knowing the exact cost of each production activity enables businesses to manage overhead costs. The core objectives of the ABC method are:
Activity-based costing (ABC) has the following features:
Activity-based costing is a two-stage procedure. It focuses on individual activities in the production process. Organisations can use this costing method to assign costs to each activity related to their products and services.
ABC method is used to prevent over-costing and under-costing to determine accurate production costs. The systematic method assigns the cost of activities to any entity, such as products, services, or even customers.
Unlike traditional costing systems that allocate costs based on material cost, labour, or revenue, activity-based costing uses multiple parameters. Regardless of the production volume, the ABC method assigns the correct cost for each product. In this method, the activities may run across various functions, providing a more realistic picture of cost behaviour.
Despite its benefits, activity-based costing is not an alternative to process or job costing. It should be used as an integral tool to refine the existing costing system.
While manufacturing organisations benefit more from activity-based costing, it is also suitable for service organisations. Medical care providers, government units, and financial institutions can also benefit from the ABC method.
Unit costing can be used to determine the cost of each output unit of functions necessary for service delivery using activity-based costing. There is no arbitrary allocation of indirect costs in this method.
ABC gives detailed information on how much money is spent on each activity. Thus, it offers a clear metric for improvement. Organisations can improve the cost-effectiveness and efficiency of production activities using ABC. It also provides an instant view of activities that add value to the outputs.
Managers can improve decision-making by identifying value-added activities. It also helps eliminate wasteful activities as employees can look at each activity separately.
ABC can be successful if businesses have a clear picture of all the activities. It can also help improve productivity by knowing the exact cost of each activity.
Activity-based costing method works based on activities, which can be tasks with specific goals, events, or other work units. Each activity could be machine calibration, product design, operation, maintenance, quality inspection, product distribution, etc.
The ABC method considers each event as a cost driver. Resources are allocated based on the cost driver requirements. Activities are broadly classified as,
The generic formula to compute cost based on the ABC method is:
Cost = Overhead for cost pool or cost drivers X Amount of activity cost driver
Sometimes, individual costs for one activity are grouped together as a cost pool. Cost drive primarily controls the cost changes of an activity.
For example, M/S Sharma Furniture, with a production capacity of 10 custom tables, wants to calculate the cost for each custom table. Instead of focusing on material costs and design hours, the company intends to use the ABC method to compute costs.
So, M/S Sharma Furniture uses the ABC method to compute the cost of a custom table:
Total ABC cost per table = 3200 + 8000 + 1000 = 12200
ABC method involves the following steps:
Activity-based costing is essential in cost optimisation. However, it is challenging to implement. Some of the advantages of ABC are:
Disadvantages of ABC are as follows:
While activity-based costing provides a holistic view of cost drivers for each product or service, all organisations do not widely implement it due to its limitations.
Features | Activity Based Costing (ABC) | Traditional Costing |
---|---|---|
Cost Allocation Basis | Allocates costs based on activities or resources consumed by each product or service. | Allocates costs based on direct labour hours, machine hours, or material costs. |
Complexity | More complex as it considers multiple cost drivers and activities to allocate costs accurately. | Less complex as it relies on simple allocation bases such as labour or machine hours. |
Accuracy | Generally provides more accurate product or service costs by directly tracing costs to specific activities. | This may result in distorted product costs, especially when indirect costs are allocated using only one or two cost drivers. |
Cost Understanding | Offers better insight into cost behaviour and cost drivers, allowing for more informed decision-making. | Provides a basic understanding of costs but may not reflect the true cost drivers impacting operations. |
Overhead Allocation | Focuses on allocating overhead costs based on activities that drive those costs, leading to more precise overhead allocation. | Often uses arbitrary overhead allocation rates, which may not reflect the actual usage of resources by different products or services. |
Adaptability to Diverse Products | Suitable for businesses with diverse product lines or services as it can accurately assign costs based on activities. | May struggle to allocate costs accurately in businesses with diverse product lines due to limited allocation bases. |
Cost Control and Optimisation | Facilitates better cost control and optimisation by identifying and managing activities that consume resources. | May result in inefficient cost control measures as costs are not accurately traced to the activities driving them. |
Implementation Challenges | May require significant resources and time to implement due to the complexity of identifying and analysing activities and cost drivers. | Generally easier to implement as it relies on existing cost allocation methods and familiar allocation bases. |
Industry Suitability | Commonly used in industries with complex production processes and multiple cost drivers, such as manufacturing and services. | Widely used across industries, particularly in traditional manufacturing where direct labour and overhead costs are significant. |
Activity-based costing (ABC) determines production costs accurately. It assigns costs to activities, maximizing cost reduction. Its features include considering direct and overhead costs, providing accurate pricing, and assigning costs to activities. Though advantageous for cost optimization, ABC is complex and requires additional data. Implementation challenges, like time and resources, limit its use.