Updated on: Jun 15th, 2024
|
2 min read
Let’s understand in detail about Standard on Auditing SA 620 Using the Work of an Auditor’s Expert :
Particulars | Details |
Scope | Auditor’s responsibilities in relation to the use of an expertise work (individual or organization) other than accounting or auditing which will assist in obtaining sufficient audit evidence |
Non – Applicable | 1. Use of expertise who is specialized in an area of accounting or auditing per SA 220 2. Expertise work in a field which is used by the entity for preparing financial statements (Management’s expert) per SA 500 |
Effective Date | Audit of financial statements for periods beginning on or after 1st April 2010 |
Auditor’s Objective | 1. Determine whether to use the work of an auditor’s expert 2. If yes, determine if that work is adequate for auditor’s purpose |
Auditor’s Responsibility | Solely responsible for the audit opinion expressed which is not reduced by the auditor’s use of the work of an expert. But subject to SA 620, the auditor may accept the expert’s finding and conclusion as an appropriate audit evidence |
Need for Expert | To obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence, if expertise in a field other than accounting or auditing is required |
I. Auditor’s Expert – “An individual or organization possessing expertise in a field other than accounting or auditing, whose work in that field is used by the auditor to assist the auditor in obtaining sufficient appropriate audit evidence. An auditor’s expert may be the auditor’s internal expert or an external expert.
II. Management Expert – “An individual or organization possessing expertise in a field other than accounting or auditing, whose work in that field is used by the entity to assist the entity in preparing the financial statements.
To determine the nature, timing, and extent of audit procedures related to expert’s work, the following matters are to be considered by the auditor:
i. Nature of the subject
ii. Risk of material misstatement
iii. The significance of expert work to the audit
iv. Auditor’s knowledge of and experience with the expert’s work
v. If the expert is subject to the auditor’s firm quality control policies & procedures
Particulars | Details |
Competence, Capabilities and Objectivity | Auditor should evaluate the expert’s competence, capabilities, and objectivity for the auditor’s purpose. W.r.t external expert, an inquiry regarding interest and relationships that may create a threat to that expert’s objectivity should be made |
Understanding of the Field of Expertise | Auditor should obtain sufficient understanding of the following: i. Nature, scope, and objectives of expert’s work ii. Evaluate the adequacy of expert work for audit purpose |
Agreement with expert work | Auditor should agree in writing the following: i. Nature, scope, and objectives of the expert work ii. Respective roles and responsibility iii. Nature, timing, and communication between the auditor and expert iv. The form of the report to be provided by expert v. Need for the expert to observe confidentiality requirements |
Adequacy of expert work | Auditor should evaluate the adequacy including: i. Relevance and reasonableness of the expert finding or conclusion ii. Consistency with other audit evidence iii. Relevance and reasonableness of any significant assumptions or methods used iv. Accuracy, completeness, and relevance of source data if any used |
Inadequate expert work | If Auditor is of the opinion that expert’ work is not adequate, then: i. Determine the nature and extent of further work to be performed by the expert ii. Perform further audit procedures appropriate to the situation |
Reference to the auditor’s expert work should not be made in an auditor’s report containing an unmodified opinion unless required by law or regulation. If such reference is-
The auditor should indicate in the auditor’s report that the references do not reduce the auditor’s responsibility for the audit opinion
SA 620 outlines auditor's responsibilities in utilizing an expert's work for audit evidence. Requirements include competence evaluation, understanding the field of expertise, agreement with expert work, adequacy evaluation, and handling inadequate work. The nature, timing, extent of audit procedures related to expert's work must be considered. The report should not mention an expert unless required by law or regulation.