GST law consists of robust audit mechanism to examine and ensure non-evasion of taxes and due compliance of the provisions. A key aspect of this framework is the internal audit under GST, which involves a systematic review of GST records and returns to identify discrepancies, prevent tax evasion, and ensure adherence to GST regulations.
One of the primary checkpoints in a GST internal audit is the reconciliation of book records against GST returns, helping to identify any mismatches or potential risks of non-compliance. Additionally, GST authorities have begun issuing show cause notices for non-compliance, underscoring the importance of proactive internal audits.
Internal audit of GST records can help a business to check the operating effectiveness of internal financial controls, identify significant risk areas and take necessary steps to mitigate the risks. This article gives you a comprehensive checklist that can be used for reviewing the GST records internally and identifying any errors or data gaps.
GST returns are periodic filings that entail details of sales, purchases, GST collected, and input tax credit claimed by a taxpayer. Some crucial returns under GST include GSTR-1 (outward supplies), GSTR-3B (summary return), and GSTR-2B (auto-populated inward supplies based on suppliers’ filings). These provide the data against which auditors verify the accuracy and completeness of tax declarations.
During an internal audit, the auditor scrutinises GST returns to ensure that the turnover declared, taxes paid, and input tax credits claimed are accurate and comply with GST laws. Discrepancies between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B or between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2B can indicate errors, omissions, or potential tax evasion. Hence, understanding the structure, data requirements, and inter-relationship of these returns is critical for effective GST audits and for minimising risks of penalties and interest.
Reconciliation refers to the process of comparing data across GST returns and accounting records to identify mismatches or errors.
Key reconciliations include:
Errors identified during reconciliation, such as omissions, incorrect tax rates, or mismatched invoice details, should be rectified promptly by filing amendments in subsequent returns. This proactive approach helps avoid interest, penalties, and show cause notices from GST authorities. Maintaining detailed documentation of reconciliation and corrections supports audit readiness and compliance.
Every month, businesses have to file a summary return GSTR 3B and report consolidated figures for sales and purchases. They are also required to compute and pay the taxes based on self-declaration Also, they are required to file GSTR-1 monthly/ quarterly based on the turnover limit and report invoice wise detail of outward supplies.
Based on the GSTR-1 filed by suppliers, GST portal will auto-populate GSTR 2B return for a particular recipient. Problem arises where there exists a difference between the figures declared in the GSTR-1 by a supplier and the corresponding summary figure declared in the GSTR-3B by him. Auditor should include the following checkpoints to ensure nil data gap and avoid the notices from GST authorities –
If the recipient claims excess input tax credit, he is liable to pay interest @24% p.a on the excess tax amount. Auditor should reconcile the GSTR 3B with GSTR 2B to ensure that the company shouldn’t claim excess input tax credit, and where it has been claimed in excess, company should pay interest and tax amount on due date. If the GST authorities identify data gaps between GSTR 3B and GSTR 1 returns, taxpayer may have to pay interest and penalty. Read more about the penalties and offenses here.
If the auditor finds any data gaps , he should recommend the management to amend the invoices and details at summary level in GSTR 1. To know more about the amendments in GSTR 1, you can read them here.
There are specific rules related to the details to be mentioned in the invoices. If invoice is not issued according to the rules, a penalty of Rs.25,000 may be imposed. The auditor must test check few sample invoices to ensure that all the details are mentioned in the invoices. If the auditor finds any variance in the format of the invoice, he should advise the management to amend the invoice and incorporate the requirements of GST invoice rules.
A recipient has to pay the invoice amount and GST to the supplier within 180 days from issuance of the invoice. If he fails to make the payment, the input tax credit will be reversed and added to the output tax liabilityInternal Auditor should check the invoice payment date against the invoice issue date to figure out the transactions where the recipient has made the payment to the supplier after 180 days.
If the auditor finds any discrepancies on a regular basis, he should recommend the management to revise the invoice payment process and pay all the dues before 180 days to ensure that entire input tax credit can be claimed.
In respect of the movement of goods worth more than Rs.50,000, the transporter has to carry e-way bill along with the invoice. In few cases, the e-way bill has to be issued even if the value of goods is less than Rs.50,000. You can read about the e-way bill in detail here. The auditor must incorporate the checkpoints in audit checklist to ensure that the business is complying with the e-way bill provisions.
An e-way bill, once generated, cannot be deleted or edited. It can only be canceled within 24 hours of its generation if the movement of goods doesn’t happen or the actual movement is different from the details mentioned in e-way bill. If the goods are moved without issuance of e-way bill, the proper officer has the power to impose the penalty and/or detain the goods till the owner of the goods doesn’t pay appropriate tax and penalty. For more detailed reading on penalties, click here. The auditor must incorporate the checkpoints in audit checklist to ensure that the business is complying with the e-way bill provisions. He should recommend the management to apply effective controls before issuing an e-way bill to avoid any financial or legal implications.
If the goods are transported in non-motor vehicles, there is no requirement to issue an e-way bill. Some businesses are resorting to the medieval method of transporting the goods in bullock or horse carts to step aside the e-way bill rules.Internal auditor should closely check the transactions worth more than Rs. 50,000 where the e-way bill is not issued due to transportation of goods in non-motor vehicles. He should identify whether non-motor vehicles were used genuinely or for bypassing the e-way bill system. If any anomalies are detected, he should report them to help the business avoid massive penalties.