After Independence, the Parliament passed several laws to uniformly regulate inheritance laws all across India. One such attempt was the Hindu Succession Act. It has evoked strong reactions from several quarters. But the position of women is much better today than it was at the time of Independence, thanks to amendments by Parliament and judgements given by the Supreme Court.
In this article, we will discuss in detail the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.
The Parliament of India passed the Hindu Succession Act in 1956. It is a national code for the inheritance and succession of property. It sought to simplify myriad norms and traditions which traditionally governed the inheritance of property in India before the passing of this act. The Hindu Succession Act, 1956 gave women full equal rights of ownership of property as men.
Under traditional Hindu law, women had a very limited right to inherit property. Two main traditions for inheritance in India were the Mitakshara and Dayabhaga laws.
Under Mitakshara school, a woman was not regarded as a coparcener. On the other hand, the Dayabhaga school allowed a widow to inherit the property of her late husband. Thus, Daybahaga school afforded greater rights to women than Mitakshara law.
But even under Dayabhaga law, if a widow died without a son, her property would be passed on to her nearest male heir, irrespective of whether she had daughters.
The Hindu Succession Act was enacted in 1956, to bring about uniformity in inheritance laws, and confer greater rights on women.
Hindu Succession Act, 1956 was enacted to simplify India’s inheritance laws. It applies to:
Thus, traditional Hindu laws don’t govern property succession among Hindus anymore. Further, provisions of any law which were inconsistent with the provisions of the Hindu Succession Act ceased to be valid for Hindus.
An amendment to the original Hindu Succession Act, 1956 was enacted in 2005. It sought to amend provisions that were contrary to women's right to inherit property. Here are some important changes it brought about:
As per Section 4(2) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, inheritance of agricultural land was not covered by it if there were already laws for them. In other words, it left the laws for the following untouched:
If a state had not passed laws for agricultural land, only in that case the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 would apply. However, in practical terms, many state tenurial laws were discriminatory against women.
The Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 changes these discriminatory provisions:
Section 23 of the Hindu Succession Act was deleted by the 2005 amendment. It discussed the inheritance of a dwelling-house if a Hindu died without leaving a will and was survived by both male and female heirs. In this case, a female heir would have no right to seek partition of the dwelling house unless the male heirs wanted so.
Originally Section 30 read: “Any Hindu may dispose of by will or other testamentary disposition any property, which is capable of being so disposed of by him…”(Emphasis added)
After the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, it reads: “Any Hindu may dispose of by will or other testamentary disposition any property, which is capable of being so disposed of by him or by her…”(Emphasis added)
Thus the role of women in the will-writing process was highlighted through this amendment.
The concept of coparcenary is at the heart of Section 6. Copracenary refers to descendants who can legally claim the property of a Hindu ancestor after he or she dies.
A woman could not claim inheritance as a coparcener under the provisions of the original Act.
The Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, modified this discriminatory clause.
As per the current version of Section 6, the daughter of a coparcener shall
It further states that any reference to a Hindu Mitakshara coparcener shall be deemed to include a reference to a daughter of a coparcener.
Section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 says, “Any property possessed by a female Hindu, whether acquired before or after the commencement of this Act, shall be held by her as full owner thereof and not as a limited owner.”(Emphasis added)
Property under Section 14 covers both movable and immovable property. These are how a female Hindu may acquire a property:
Section 15 states the order in which property should be passed on if a Hindu female dies without leaving a will. There are also some rules listed for it under Section 16.
This is the order of succession as per Section 15:
Section 16 elaborates on the rules which govern succession in the case of a female Hindu dying without a will. These are the rules it states.
Rule 1: Among heirs specified in Section 15, those in one entry shall be preferred to those in any succeeding entry, and those included in the same entry shall take simultaneously.
Rule 2: If any son or daughter had died before the female ancestor, leaving behind his or her children, the children of such son or daughter shall take between them the share which such son or daughter would have taken if they were alive at the time of the female ancestor’s death.
Under the Schedule of the Hindu Succession Act, a mother is a Class I heir. So her property rights are governed by the relevant sections, including Sections 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, and 16.
Under the Schedule of the Hindu Succession Act, a daughter is a Class I heir. So her property rights are governed by the relevant sections, including Sections 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, and 16.
The Supreme Court’s 2018 judgement in Vineeta Sharma vs. Rakesh Sharma & Ors is also important. It said daughters enjoy equal coparcenary status with sons irrespective of when they were born or if their father was alive on 9 September 2005, when the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 came into force.
The marriage of a daughter has no relevance for inheriting property. As a daughter, she enjoys the same coparcenary rights as a son. Moreover, she is also a class I heir. So relevant sections of the Hindu Succession Act will be applicable in this case.
A widow is a class I heir under the Schedule of Hindu Succession. If a male Hindu dies without leaving a will, property succession is governed by relevant provisions such as Sections 8, 9, and 10.
Rule 1 under Section 10 says that if a Hindu male dies without a will, then the widow, or widows if there’s more than one, shall take one share.
Apart from this, all the rights which accrue to a daughter are also available to a married woman.
While transmission of property can lead to greater wealth and prosperity, unequal and low transmission can lead to greater wealth inequality. In particular, property inheritance is very important for women who don’t have much wealth and property to begin with. In such a scenario, land and property can even become an important source of livelihood for a woman.
The Hindu Succession Act (Amendment) Act, 2005, significantly increased women’s likelihood of inheriting property. In certain cases, it also leads to an increased age of marriage for women. Moreover, even if a woman has not inherited property, the fact that she is entitled by law to do so can significantly increase her bargaining power. In the Indian context, this can also lead to a greater voice in terms of marital affairs.