Over the past decade, the rise of technology and electronic commerce has led to a surge in cybercrimes and data-related offences in India. As per the latest news by a renowned paper house, the cybercrime cases increased from 3,693 in 2012 to 65,893 in 2022, recording the highest spike rate. The situation became alarming as even data crucial to national security and integrity was at risk. In response, the government opted to regulate activities on electronic mediums and the data stored therein.
Thus, the Information Technology Act or IT Act 2000 was introduced. In this article, we will provide a comprehensive overview of this Act, highlighting all the associated factors that you need to know.
A legal framework proposed by the Indian Parliament, the Informational Technology Act of 2000, is the primary legislation in India dealing with cybercrime and electronic commerce. It was formulated to ensure the lawful conduct of digital transactions and the reduction of cyber crimes, on the basis of the United Nations Model Law on Electronic Commerce 1996 (UNCITRAL Model). This legal framework, also known as IT Act 2000, comes with 94 sections, divided into 13 chapters and 2 schedules.
The bill of this law was passed in the Budget by a group of Parliament members, headed by the then Minister of Information Technology and signed by the President on 9 May 2000. It finally came into effect on October 17, imposing restrictions on all individuals regardless of their nationality and geographic location.
Read the pointers highlighted below to understand the importance of formulating Information Technology Act 2000:
The following are the main objectives of the Information Technology Act of 2000 that you should know:
Take a look at the salient features of the Information Technology Act 2000:
As technology evolved over time, the Indian Parliament recognized the need to revise the Act in order to align it with societal needs, resulting in its amendment. Two significant amendments were made to the IT Act 2000 that you should know about.
The 2008 amendment came up with modifications to Section 66A of the IT Act, 2000. The section outlined penalties for sharing offensive messages electronically. This includes any message or information that incited hatred or compromised the integrity and security of the nation. However, the lack of clarity in defining 'offensive' messages led to unnecessary punishment of several individuals, ultimately resulting in the striking down of the section.
In 2015, another bill was initiated to amend Section 66A with the aim of safeguarding the fundamental rights guaranteed to citizens by the country's Constitution. This was later accomplished by declaring it as violative of Article 19 of the Constitution.
The Information Technology Act 2000 includes provisions that legally introduce the use of digital signatures for submitting crucial documents online, ensuring their security and authenticity. The Act further mandates all companies/LLPs under the MCA21 e-Governance programme to utilise digital signatures for document filing.
Electronic Governance or E-Governance involves the application of legal rules and regulations for managing, controlling, and administering government processes that are conducted through electronic means. Keep reading to find out how electronic governance is dealt with under the Information Technology Act 2000:
The Information Technology Act 2000 has 94 sections focusing on the regulation of electronic exchanges. These sections collectively establish a comprehensive framework for electronic governance, digital signatures, and the legal recognition of electronic records. All these sections play a crucial role in facilitating the use of digital technologies in governance.
Section 43 of Chapter IX of the IT Act, 2000 outlines various actions for which a penalty is imposed if done without permission from the person in charge of the computer system. These actions are discussed below.
If an individual engages in any action outlined in Section 43 with dishonest or fraudulent intent, he/she shall be subject to punishment. As per Section 66 of the IT Act 2000, this punishment may include imprisonment for a period of up to 3 years, a fine of up to Rs. 5 lakh, or both.
The Information Technology Act of 2000 was amended to introduce a new section, Section 66A in order to address instances of cybercrime arising from the emergence of technology and the internet. This section imposes penalties for sending offensive messages through communication services.
As per this section, a person will face punishment in the following scenarios:
Section 66B outlines the punishment for dishonestly receiving stolen computer resources or communication devices. As per this section, anyone who knowingly receives or retains any stolen computer resource or communication device shall be liable to imprisonment for up to 3 years, or a fine of up to Rs. 1 lakh, or both.
Section 67A deals with the punishment for publishing or sharing material containing sexually explicit acts in electronic form. On 1st conviction, individuals who publish such material shall face imprisonment for up to 5 years and a fine of up to Rs. 10 lakh. In the event of a 2nd or subsequent conviction, the punishment may extend to imprisonment for up to 7 years and a fine of up to Rs. 10 lakh.
There are provisions in the Information Technology Act 2000 that outline different offences and penalties related to the misuse of technology and electronic communication. Let us take a look:
Section | Offence | Penalty |
Section 65 | Tampering documents stored within a computer system | Imprisonment of 3 years or a fine of Rs. 2 lakhs or both |
Section 66 | Offences associated with computers or any act outlined in Section 43 | Imprisonment of 3 years or a fine that extends to Rs. 5 lakhs or both |
Section 66B | Dishonestly receiving a stolen computer source or device | Imprisonment for 3 years or a fine of Rs. 1 lakh or both |
Section 66C | Identity theft | Imprisonment of 3 years or a fine of Rs. 1 lakh or both |
Section 66D | Cheating by personation | Either imprisonment for 3 years or a fine of Rs. 1 lakh or both |
Section 66E | Invading privacy | Either imprisonment up to 3 years or a fine of Rs. 2 lakhs or both |
Section 66F | Cyber terrorism | Life imprisonment |
Section 67 | Sending explicit or obscene material in electronic form | Imprisonment of 5 years and a fine of Rs. 10 lakhs |
Section 67A | Sending material containing sexually explicit acts through electronic means | Imprisonment of 7 years and a fine of Rs. 10 lakhs |
Section 67B | Depicting children in sexually explicit form and sharing such material through electronic mode | Imprisonment of 7 years and a fine of Rs. 10 lakhs |
Section 67C | Failure to preserve and retain the information by intermediaries | Imprisonment for 3 years and a fine |
When it comes to cybersecurity, there are 5 main types of laws followed in India. These include the Information Technology Act 2000 (IT Act), the Indian Penal Code of 1860 (IPC), the Information Technology Rules (IT Rules), the Companies Act of 2013, and the Cybersecurity Framework (NCFS).
The cyber law established under the IT Act of 2000 stands as the first cyber law approved by the Indian Parliament. It highlights penalties and sanctions enacted by the Parliament of India that safeguard the sectors of e-governance, e-banking and e-commerce.
While the IT Act of 2000 offers numerous benefits, it also carries certain disadvantages. Let us begin by exploring its advantages.
Let us now walk through a list of disadvantages that came forth after the enactment of the Information Technology Act 2000:
With the rapid escalation of cybercrime cases in India, there emerged an urgent need for a mechanism to detect and control them. The IT Act 2000 is a step towards safeguarding the data and sensitive information stored with online intermediaries. In addition, this Act comes with various provisions that benefit citizens and protect their data from misuse.
The rise in cybercrimes led to India enforcing the Information Technology Act 2000, impacting e-commerce, cybercrime, and digital transactions. Amendments and penalties target offenders. It recognizes electronic signatures, data protection, and the creation of certifying authorities. The Act promotes electronic governance and outlines various cybercrimes and penalties.