One Nation One Election means holding Lok Sabha and State Assembly elections simultaneously across India. The idea is to reduce costs, avoid governance disruptions caused by frequent elections, and streamline the democratic process. First practiced between 1951 and 1967, the model has gained renewed attention with the government exploring its feasibility through expert committees and recent constitutional discussions.
Key Highlights:
- Needs constitutional amendments and cycle alignment across states.
- Cuts election costs and administrative burden significantly.
- Ensures uninterrupted governance by reducing Model Code of Conduct delays.
Former Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna has raised serious constitutional concerns before the Joint Parliamentary Committee reviewing the One Nation One Election Bill (Constitution 129th Amendment).
He warned that the proposed legislation grants the Election Commission of India (ECI) “unfettered discretion” under Clause 5 of Article 82A. This allowed it to postpone state assembly polls even when general elections are scheduled which would potentially undermine India’s federal structure.
Sanjiv Khanna cautioned that such provisions may violate Article 14 (equality before the law) and lead to indirect imposition of President's Rule, allowing the Union government to effectively control state governments.
Similar concerns echo earlier objections raised by other former CJIs like U.U. Lalit, J.S. Khehar, D.Y. Chandrachud, Ranjan Gogoi, and Jagdish Singh Kehar, highlighting the need for constitutional safeguards and balance.
One Nation One Election means holding elections for the Lok Sabha, State Assemblies, and eventually Panchayats and Municipalities together in a synchronized manner. From 1951 to 1967, India followed this model successfully.
However, premature dissolutions of certain state assemblies and the Lok Sabha in the late 1960s disrupted the cycle. Since then, India has been conducting multiple elections each year, creating high administrative and financial costs.
The Law Commission of India (170th Report) recommended reconsidering this system to improve efficiency. If implemented, the concept would ensure elections only once every five years, covering both central and state levels simultaneously.
The implementation requires two major steps:
This phased approach is expected to reduce political resistance while aligning the electoral cycles gradually.
The advantages of One Nation One Election extend beyond cost reduction, as it can strengthen governance and improve political stability.
Implementing One Nation One Election in India faces several challenges, including syncing and adjusting electoral cycles across states.
One Nation One Election means conducting simultaneous elections for the Lok Sabha and all State Legislative Assemblies, streamlining the electoral process to once every five years. The ongoing debate highlights that implementing One Nation One Election in India will require not only political consensus but also legal reforms and practical readiness to balance efficiency with democratic representation.